Photo: 123rf
ESG ratings have become indispensable in the world of investor relations. They provide guidance in assessing and showcasing a company’s sustainability performance. However, studies reveal that the ESG ratings market faces significant challenges.
Diverse Assessment Approaches
According to Berenberg Bank, the methodology of ESG rating agencies resembles a kaleidoscope rather than a unified approach. Varied assessment methods can cause a company’s ESG rating to differ significantly depending on the agency, leading to discrepancies that confuse investors and make it harder for IR teams to convey a consistent message.
The key is to closely examine how these ratings are generated: What methodologies are used, and which ratings best reflect the company’s sustainability strategy? By openly communicating their preferences and evaluations, companies can acheive transparency and build trust.
Lack of Transparency
Another drawback is that the ESG ratings landscape is often as opaque as a foggy winter morning. A recent study by BaFin highlights that ESG data is costly and provides little transparency. Many agencies fail to disclose which indicators they use or how these are weighted. For IR teams, this means they often operate in the dark, unable to influence the evaluation process effectively.
The solution? Companies should spotlight their ESG data themselves. Through independent validation and proactive communication about their initiatives, they can not only create clarity, but also strengthen their standing with investors.
Absence of Standardization
A major stumbling block to meaningful ESG ratings is the lack of standardization. According to Deloitte Germany, each rating agency uses its own criteria, making comparisons a challenge. For IR teams, this means laboriously tailoring their data to meet varied requirements.
The introduction of unified standards, such as those promoted by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), could provide a remedy. Such harmonization would not only reduce the workload for companies but also offer investors a clearer basis for decision-making.
Conclusion
ESG ratings are a valuable tool, but they are not self-propelled. Companies must recognize the weaknesses in the current system and take proactive steps. Transparency, publishing their own ESG data, and engaging in dialogue with rating agencies are key to ensuring credibility and to presenting their sustainability strategy in a convincing manner.
After all, it’s not just the rating that matters—but also the message conveyed along with it.
Sources:
Welt
Bafin
Dpn-online
Bafin
Deloitte